AI Governance,Unified.

One workspace for AI systems, controls, evidence and human review across nine coverage modules.

Nine coverage modules, available now
Senturian AI Governance platform — AI System Registry

Your best people are stuck doing compliance by spreadsheet.

10:15 am

Product ManagerManually routing ISO/IEC 42001 spreadsheets to ML engineers. Copy. Paste. Chase. Repeat.

2:30 pm

Legal CounselOn hour three of extracting answers from technical model cards to satisfy the EU AI Act.

4:45 pm

Security LeadReconciling overlapping controls across regions by hand, instead of securing the systems they run.

They're not slow. The tools are scattered.

The Platform

Governance systems that do the work

Not generic GRC. Not static PDFs. A live control plane that automates AI compliance and evidence collection, so your team can focus on building.

Map

Unified coverage mapping

One answer supports many controls. Senturian reconciles overlapping requirements across nine coverage modules at the control, clause and evidence level.

01
Collect

Evidence, kept with the work

Documents live in a versioned library. Model cards, PIAs, evaluations and sign-offs link to the exact control they support, with change history and reviewer attribution.

02
Score

Risk, scored in real time

A library of 515 AI-specific risks, searchable and ready to map to your work. Severity × likelihood brings drift signals, red-team findings and guidance into one matrix.

03
Review

Reviewer workflow, without the email chains

RBAC across Admin, Reviewer, Editor and Auditor. Smart autosave, change detection and clear notifications keep sign-offs moving without spam.

04
Report

Structured, review-ready reporting

Generate the disclosure, the statement of applicability or the board pack from the work itself — with the audit trail attached and the right reviewer on record.

05
Answer

Co-Pilot, grounded in your policy

Retrieval over your ingested controls, clauses and evidence — hybrid vector + keyword search, re-ranked with Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Every answer cites the source it drew from.

06
Coverage

Nine coverage modules, one operating view.

EU AI Act, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Singapore AI Verify, Philippines PIA, NZ PIA, AU PIA, Canada AIA and Māori Data Sovereignty — each modelled at the control, clause and evidence level, with the overlaps pre-reconciled.

  • EU AI Act
    Project assessment
    Available
  • ISO 27001
    Organisation framework
    Available
  • ISO/IEC 42001
    Organisation framework
    Available
  • Singapore AI Verify
    Project assessment
    Available
  • Philippines PIA
    Project assessment
    Available
  • NZ PIA
    Project assessment
    Available
  • AU PIA
    Project assessment
    Available
  • Canada AIA
    Project assessment
    Available
  • Māori Data Sovereignty
    Organisation framework
    Available
Inside the platform

Four surfaces your governance team will actually open on Monday.

See how Senturian turns a written obligation into a closed control — with the evidence, a reviewer signature and an audit trail attached.

Hybrid retrievalpgvector + BM25Org-scoped

Ask the standard. Cite the clause.

Every answer is grounded in your organisation's ingested policy library, evidence and control responses. Hybrid retrieval (vector + keyword) re-ranked with Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Citations link back to the exact paragraph the answer drew from.

You
What are our obligations under EU AI Act Article 9 for the credit-scoring model?
S
Article 9 requires a continuous risk-management system across the model's lifecycle. For credit-scoring-v4, your current responses cover identification, analysis and evaluation — but post-market monitoring is only partially addressed. Drift signals fire, but incidents aren't yet logged to the risk register.
EU AI Act · Art. 9 §2(a–d)Control response · §4.3MLflow run 2f41a9Risk #R-0218
S
Drafting a remediation task for the owner…
How it works

From AI inventory to review-ready work.

Start with the AI system. Apply the coverage module that fits the work. Link evidence and route the review.

  1. 01

    Register AI systems

    Keep the systems your organisation uses in one governed inventory.

  2. 02

    Apply the relevant coverage

    Work through the controls and assessment structure for the module that applies.

  3. 03

    Link evidence and review

    Connect documents and responses to the work, then route it to the right reviewer.

Make governance work visible.

Give teams one place to see the AI systems they run, the work they need to complete, the evidence attached, and what still needs review.

9
Coverage modules across organisation and project-level governance work
Coverage
515
AI-specific risks, searchable and ready to map to your work
Risk library
One workspace
AI systems, control responses, evidence and review status together
Operating view

Governance is complex. Senturian keeps it moving.

Map the coverage

Nine coverage modules in one operating view. Map the controls, evidence and review work that applies.

Start with your AI inventory

Keep evidence with the work

Link documents, control responses and review status to the exact requirement they support — with version history and reviewer attribution.

Link the evidence you already have

Move the next review

See what needs review, route it to the right owner, and track status in one place — without the email chains.

Route the next review

Unified governance starts with one working control.

Book a 30-minute walkthrough. We'll map your live AI systems to the coverage modules that apply — live, in the call, with your data.

Start with one AI system and the coverage module that applies