Unified coverage mapping
One answer supports many controls. Senturian reconciles overlapping requirements across nine coverage modules at the control, clause and evidence level.
01One workspace for AI systems, controls, evidence and human review across nine coverage modules.

Product ManagerManually routing ISO/IEC 42001 spreadsheets to ML engineers. Copy. Paste. Chase. Repeat.
Legal CounselOn hour three of extracting answers from technical model cards to satisfy the EU AI Act.
Security LeadReconciling overlapping controls across regions by hand, instead of securing the systems they run.
They're not slow. The tools are scattered.
The Platform
Not generic GRC. Not static PDFs. A live control plane that automates AI compliance and evidence collection, so your team can focus on building.
One answer supports many controls. Senturian reconciles overlapping requirements across nine coverage modules at the control, clause and evidence level.
01Documents live in a versioned library. Model cards, PIAs, evaluations and sign-offs link to the exact control they support, with change history and reviewer attribution.
02A library of 515 AI-specific risks, searchable and ready to map to your work. Severity × likelihood brings drift signals, red-team findings and guidance into one matrix.
03RBAC across Admin, Reviewer, Editor and Auditor. Smart autosave, change detection and clear notifications keep sign-offs moving without spam.
04Generate the disclosure, the statement of applicability or the board pack from the work itself — with the audit trail attached and the right reviewer on record.
05Retrieval over your ingested controls, clauses and evidence — hybrid vector + keyword search, re-ranked with Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Every answer cites the source it drew from.
06EU AI Act, ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Singapore AI Verify, Philippines PIA, NZ PIA, AU PIA, Canada AIA and Māori Data Sovereignty — each modelled at the control, clause and evidence level, with the overlaps pre-reconciled.
See how Senturian turns a written obligation into a closed control — with the evidence, a reviewer signature and an audit trail attached.
Every answer is grounded in your organisation's ingested policy library, evidence and control responses. Hybrid retrieval (vector + keyword) re-ranked with Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Citations link back to the exact paragraph the answer drew from.
The register brings drift signals, red-team findings, incident logs and guidance into one matrix. Each cell is a filter; each pin is a live risk with an owner and a clock.
Link documents, control responses, review status and timestamps in one place. Model cards, PIAs, red-team reports and board minutes each connect to the exact control they support.
Admin, Reviewer, Editor, Auditor. Assign owners per control, route approvals, and only notify when something meaningful changed. Everything else is invisible plumbing.
Start with the AI system. Apply the coverage module that fits the work. Link evidence and route the review.
Keep the systems your organisation uses in one governed inventory.
Work through the controls and assessment structure for the module that applies.
Connect documents and responses to the work, then route it to the right reviewer.
Give teams one place to see the AI systems they run, the work they need to complete, the evidence attached, and what still needs review.
Nine coverage modules in one operating view. Map the controls, evidence and review work that applies.
Link documents, control responses and review status to the exact requirement they support — with version history and reviewer attribution.
See what needs review, route it to the right owner, and track status in one place — without the email chains.
Book a 30-minute walkthrough. We'll map your live AI systems to the coverage modules that apply — live, in the call, with your data.